POSTERIOR MALLEOLAR FRACTURES

Authors

  • Dr Radoslav Petrov Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Institute, Ministry of Interior, Sofia, Bulgaria
  • Prof. Roumen Kastelov Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Institute, Ministry of Interior, Sofia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58542/jbota.v63i1.237

Keywords:

posterior malleolus, ankle fracture, syndesmosis, classification, surgical fixation

Abstract

Abstract

Posterior malleolus fractures are increasingly recognized as a key determinant of ankle stability and long-term functional outcomes. Traditional size-based indications for fixation have been challenged by advances in imaging and biomechanical understanding.

Objective: To provide a comprehensive and critical overview of current concepts in the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of posterior malleolus fractures.

Methods: A narrative review of contemporary literature was conducted, focusing on systematic reviews, biomechanical studies, and clinical outcome analyses.

Results: Evidence supports CT-based morphological assessment over fragment size alone. Direct posterior fixation offers improved articular reduction and syndesmotic stability in selected cases.

Conclusion: Management should be individualized based on fracture morphology, stability, and joint congruency. Anatomical reduction remains the cornerstone of optimal outcomes.

Author Biographies

Dr Radoslav Petrov, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Institute, Ministry of Interior, Sofia, Bulgaria

Specialist in Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Physician at Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Institute, Ministry of Interior, Sofia

Prof. Roumen Kastelov, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Institute, Ministry of Interior, Sofia

Professor, Head of Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Institute, Ministry of Interior, Sofia

Downloads

Published

20.09.2026

How to Cite

Petrov, R., & Kastelov, R. (2026). POSTERIOR MALLEOLAR FRACTURES. THE JOURNAL OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMA ASSOCIATION, 63(1), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.58542/jbota.v63i1.237

Issue

Section

Review